Files
smartmate/backend/agent/scheduleplan/react.go
Losita f3f9902e93 Version: 0.7.1.dev.260321
feat(agent):  重构智能排程分流与双通道交付,补齐周级预算并接入连续微调复用

- 🔀 通用路由升级为 action 分流(chat/quick_note_create/task_query/schedule_plan),路由失败直接返回内部错误,不再回落聊天
- 🧭 智能排程链路重构:统一图编排与节点职责,完善日级/周级调优协作与提示词约束
- 📊 周级预算改为“有效周保底 + 负载加权分配”,避免有效周零预算并提升资源利用率
- ⚙️ 日级并发优化细化:按天拆分 DayGroup 并发执行,低收益天(suggested<=2)跳过,单天失败仅回退该天结果并继续全局
- 🧵 周级并发优化细化:按周并发 worker 执行,单周“单步动作”循环(每轮仅 1 个 Move/Swap 或 done),失败周保留原方案不影响其它周
- 🛰️ 新增排程预览双通道:聊天主链路输出终审文本,结构化 candidate_plans 通过 /api/v1/agent/schedule-preview 拉取
- 🗃️ 增补 Redis 预览缓存读写与清理逻辑,新增对应 API、路由、模型与错误码支持
- ♻️ 接入连续对话微调复用:命中同会话历史预览时复用上轮 HybridEntries,避免每轮重跑粗排
- 🛡️ 增加复用保护:仅当本轮与上轮 task_class_ids 集合一致才复用;不一致回退全量粗排
- 🧰 扩展预览缓存字段(task_class_ids/hybrid_entries/allocated_items),支撑微调承接链路
- 🗺️ 更新 README 5.4 Mermaid(总分流图 + 智能排程流转图)并补充决策文档

- ⚠️ 新增“连续微调复用”链路我尚未完成测试,且文档状态目前较为混乱,待连续对话微调功能真正测试完成后再统一更新
2026-03-21 22:08:35 +08:00

848 lines
26 KiB
Go
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
package scheduleplan
import (
"context"
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
"sort"
"strings"
"sync"
"time"
"github.com/LoveLosita/smartflow/backend/model"
"github.com/cloudwego/eino-ext/components/model/ark"
einoModel "github.com/cloudwego/eino/components/model"
"github.com/cloudwego/eino/schema"
arkModel "github.com/volcengine/volcengine-go-sdk/service/arkruntime/model"
)
const (
// weeklyReactRoundTimeout 是周级“单步动作”单轮超时时间。
//
// 说明:
// 1. 当前周级策略是“每轮只做一个动作”,单轮输入较短,超时可比旧版更保守;
// 2. 过长超时会放大长尾等待,影响并发周优化的整体收口速度。
weeklyReactRoundTimeout = 4 * time.Minute
)
// weeklyRefineWorkerResult 是“单周 worker”输出。
//
// 职责边界:
// 1. 记录该周优化后的 entries
// 2. 记录预算消耗(总动作/有效动作);
// 3. 记录动作日志,供 final_check 生成“过程可解释”总结;
// 4. 记录该周摘要,便于最终汇总。
type weeklyRefineWorkerResult struct {
Week int
Entries []model.HybridScheduleEntry
TotalUsed int
EffectiveUsed int
Summary string
ActionLogs []string
}
// runWeeklyRefineNode 执行“周级单步优化”。
//
// 新链路目标:
// 1. 把全量周数据拆成“按周并发”执行,降低单次模型输入规模;
// 2. 每轮只允许一个动作Move/Swap或 done减少模型犹豫
// 3. 使用“双预算”约束迭代:
// 3.1 总动作预算:成功/失败都扣减;
// 3.2 有效动作预算:仅成功动作扣减;
// 4. 不在该阶段输出 reasoning 文本,改为阶段状态 + 动作结果,避免刷屏。
func runWeeklyRefineNode(
ctx context.Context,
st *SchedulePlanState,
chatModel *ark.ChatModel,
outChan chan<- string,
modelName string,
emitStage func(stage, detail string),
) (*SchedulePlanState, error) {
_ = outChan
if st == nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("schedule plan weekly refine: nil state")
}
if chatModel == nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("schedule plan weekly refine: model is nil")
}
if len(st.HybridEntries) == 0 {
st.ReactDone = true
st.ReactSummary = "无可优化的排程条目。"
return st, nil
}
if strings.TrimSpace(modelName) == "" {
modelName = "worker"
}
// 1. 预算与并发兜底。
// 1.1 有效预算(旧字段)<=0 时回退默认值;
// 1.2 总预算 <=0 时回退默认值;
// 1.3 为避免“有效预算 > 总预算”的反直觉状态,做一次归一化修正;
// 1.4 周级并发度默认不高于周数,避免空并发浪费。
if st.WeeklyAdjustBudget <= 0 {
st.WeeklyAdjustBudget = schedulePlanDefaultWeeklyAdjustBudget
}
if st.WeeklyTotalBudget <= 0 {
st.WeeklyTotalBudget = schedulePlanDefaultWeeklyTotalBudget
}
if st.WeeklyAdjustBudget > st.WeeklyTotalBudget {
st.WeeklyAdjustBudget = st.WeeklyTotalBudget
}
if st.WeeklyRefineConcurrency <= 0 {
st.WeeklyRefineConcurrency = schedulePlanDefaultWeeklyRefineConcurrency
}
// 2. 按周拆分输入。
weekOrder, weekEntries := splitHybridEntriesByWeek(st.HybridEntries)
if len(weekOrder) == 0 {
st.ReactDone = true
st.ReactSummary = "无可优化的排程条目。"
return st, nil
}
// 3. 只对“包含 suggested 的周”分配预算,其余周直接透传。
activeWeeks := make([]int, 0, len(weekOrder))
for _, week := range weekOrder {
if countSuggested(weekEntries[week]) > 0 {
activeWeeks = append(activeWeeks, week)
}
}
if len(activeWeeks) == 0 {
st.ReactDone = true
st.ReactSummary = "当前方案中没有可调整的 suggested 任务,已跳过周级优化。"
return st, nil
}
// 3.1 强制“每个有效周至少 1 个总预算 + 1 个有效预算”。
// 3.1.1 判断依据:任何有效周都必须有机会进入优化,避免出现 0 预算跳过。
// 3.1.2 实现方式:当全局预算不足时,自动抬升到 activeWeeks 数量。
// 3.1.3 失败/兜底:该步骤仅做内存字段修正,不依赖外部资源,不会新增失败点。
minBudgetRequired := len(activeWeeks)
if st.WeeklyTotalBudget < minBudgetRequired {
st.WeeklyTotalBudget = minBudgetRequired
}
if st.WeeklyAdjustBudget < minBudgetRequired {
st.WeeklyAdjustBudget = minBudgetRequired
}
if st.WeeklyAdjustBudget > st.WeeklyTotalBudget {
st.WeeklyAdjustBudget = st.WeeklyTotalBudget
}
totalBudgetByWeek, effectiveBudgetByWeek, weeklyLoads, coveredWeeks := splitWeeklyBudgetsByLoad(
activeWeeks,
weekEntries,
st.WeeklyTotalBudget,
st.WeeklyAdjustBudget,
)
budgetIndexByWeek := make(map[int]int, len(activeWeeks))
for idx, week := range activeWeeks {
budgetIndexByWeek[week] = idx
}
if coveredWeeks < len(activeWeeks) {
emitStage(
"schedule_plan.weekly_refine.budget_fallback",
fmt.Sprintf(
"周级预算不足以覆盖全部有效周(有效周=%d至少需预算=%d当前总预算=%d有效预算=%d。已按周负载优先覆盖 %d 个周,其余周预算置 0 并透传原方案。",
len(activeWeeks),
len(activeWeeks),
st.WeeklyTotalBudget,
st.WeeklyAdjustBudget,
coveredWeeks,
),
)
}
workerConcurrency := st.WeeklyRefineConcurrency
if workerConcurrency > len(activeWeeks) {
workerConcurrency = len(activeWeeks)
}
if workerConcurrency <= 0 {
workerConcurrency = 1
}
emitStage(
"schedule_plan.weekly_refine.start",
fmt.Sprintf(
"周级单步优化开始:周数=%d可优化=%d并发度=%d总动作预算=%d有效动作预算=%d覆盖周=%d/%d周负载=%v。",
len(weekOrder),
len(activeWeeks),
workerConcurrency,
st.WeeklyTotalBudget,
st.WeeklyAdjustBudget,
coveredWeeks,
len(activeWeeks),
weeklyLoads,
),
)
// 4. 并发执行“单周 worker”。
sem := make(chan struct{}, workerConcurrency)
var wg sync.WaitGroup
var mu sync.Mutex
workerResults := make(map[int]weeklyRefineWorkerResult, len(weekOrder))
var firstErr error
completedWeeks := 0
for _, week := range weekOrder {
week := week
entries := deepCopyEntries(weekEntries[week])
// 4.1 没有 suggested 的周直接透传,不占模型调用预算。
if countSuggested(entries) == 0 {
workerResults[week] = weeklyRefineWorkerResult{
Week: week,
Entries: entries,
Summary: fmt.Sprintf("W%d 无 suggested 任务,跳过周级优化。", week),
}
continue
}
wg.Add(1)
go func() {
defer wg.Done()
select {
case sem <- struct{}{}:
defer func() { <-sem }()
case <-ctx.Done():
mu.Lock()
if firstErr == nil {
firstErr = ctx.Err()
}
completedWeeks++
workerResults[week] = weeklyRefineWorkerResult{
Week: week,
Entries: entries,
Summary: fmt.Sprintf("W%d 优化取消,已保留原方案。", week),
}
emitStage(
"schedule_plan.weekly_refine.week_done",
fmt.Sprintf("W%d 已取消并回退原方案。(进度 %d/%d", week, completedWeeks, len(activeWeeks)),
)
mu.Unlock()
return
}
idx := budgetIndexByWeek[week]
weekTotalBudget := totalBudgetByWeek[idx]
weekEffectiveBudget := effectiveBudgetByWeek[idx]
emitStage(
"schedule_plan.weekly_refine.week_start",
fmt.Sprintf(
"W%d 开始周级单步优化:总预算=%d有效预算=%d。",
week,
weekTotalBudget,
weekEffectiveBudget,
),
)
result, workerErr := runSingleWeekRefineWorker(
ctx,
chatModel,
modelName,
week,
entries,
st.Constraints,
weeklyPlanningWindow{
Enabled: st.HasPlanningWindow,
StartWeek: st.PlanStartWeek,
StartDay: st.PlanStartDay,
EndWeek: st.PlanEndWeek,
EndDay: st.PlanEndDay,
},
weekTotalBudget,
weekEffectiveBudget,
emitStage,
)
mu.Lock()
defer mu.Unlock()
if workerErr != nil && firstErr == nil {
firstErr = workerErr
}
completedWeeks++
workerResults[week] = result
emitStage(
"schedule_plan.weekly_refine.week_done",
fmt.Sprintf(
"W%d 周级优化完成(总已用=%d/%d有效已用=%d/%d进度 %d/%d",
week,
result.TotalUsed,
weekTotalBudget,
result.EffectiveUsed,
weekEffectiveBudget,
completedWeeks,
len(activeWeeks),
),
)
}()
}
wg.Wait()
// 5. 汇总 worker 结果,重建全量 HybridEntries。
mergedEntries := make([]model.HybridScheduleEntry, 0, len(st.HybridEntries))
st.WeeklyTotalUsed = 0
st.WeeklyAdjustUsed = 0
st.WeeklyActionLogs = st.WeeklyActionLogs[:0]
weekSummaries := make([]string, 0, len(weekOrder))
for _, week := range weekOrder {
result, exists := workerResults[week]
if !exists {
// 理论上不会发生;兜底透传该周原始条目。
result = weeklyRefineWorkerResult{
Week: week,
Entries: deepCopyEntries(weekEntries[week]),
Summary: fmt.Sprintf("W%d 未拿到 worker 结果,已保留原方案。", week),
}
}
mergedEntries = append(mergedEntries, result.Entries...)
st.WeeklyTotalUsed += result.TotalUsed
st.WeeklyAdjustUsed += result.EffectiveUsed
st.WeeklyActionLogs = append(st.WeeklyActionLogs, result.ActionLogs...)
if strings.TrimSpace(result.Summary) != "" {
weekSummaries = append(weekSummaries, result.Summary)
}
}
sortHybridEntries(mergedEntries)
st.HybridEntries = mergedEntries
// 6. 生成阶段摘要并收口状态。
st.ReactDone = true
st.ReactRound = st.WeeklyTotalUsed
if len(weekSummaries) == 0 {
st.ReactSummary = fmt.Sprintf(
"周级优化完成:总动作已用 %d/%d有效动作已用 %d/%d。",
st.WeeklyTotalUsed, st.WeeklyTotalBudget, st.WeeklyAdjustUsed, st.WeeklyAdjustBudget,
)
} else {
st.ReactSummary = strings.Join(weekSummaries, "")
}
if firstErr != nil {
emitStage("schedule_plan.weekly_refine.partial_error", fmt.Sprintf("周级并发优化部分失败,已自动保留失败周原方案。原因:%s", firstErr.Error()))
}
emitStage(
"schedule_plan.weekly_refine.done",
fmt.Sprintf(
"周级单步优化结束:总动作已用 %d/%d有效动作已用 %d/%d。",
st.WeeklyTotalUsed, st.WeeklyTotalBudget, st.WeeklyAdjustUsed, st.WeeklyAdjustBudget,
),
)
return st, nil
}
// runSingleWeekRefineWorker 执行“单周 + 单步动作”循环。
//
// 流程说明:
// 1. 每轮只允许 1 个工具调用或 done
// 2. 每次工具调用都扣“总预算”;
// 3. 仅成功调用再扣“有效预算”;
// 4. 工具结果会回灌到下一轮上下文,驱动“走一步看一步”。
func runSingleWeekRefineWorker(
ctx context.Context,
chatModel *ark.ChatModel,
modelName string,
week int,
entries []model.HybridScheduleEntry,
constraints []string,
window weeklyPlanningWindow,
totalBudget int,
effectiveBudget int,
emitStage func(stage, detail string),
) (weeklyRefineWorkerResult, error) {
result := weeklyRefineWorkerResult{
Week: week,
Entries: deepCopyEntries(entries),
}
if totalBudget <= 0 || effectiveBudget <= 0 {
result.Summary = fmt.Sprintf("W%d 预算为 0跳过周级优化。", week)
return result, nil
}
hybridJSON, err := json.Marshal(result.Entries)
if err != nil {
result.Summary = fmt.Sprintf("W%d 序列化失败,已保留原方案。", week)
return result, fmt.Errorf("周级 worker 序列化失败 week=%d: %w", week, err)
}
constraintsText := "无"
if len(constraints) > 0 {
constraintsText = strings.Join(constraints, "、")
}
messages := []*schema.Message{
schema.SystemMessage(
renderWeeklyPromptWithBudget(
effectiveBudget-result.EffectiveUsed,
effectiveBudget,
result.EffectiveUsed,
totalBudget-result.TotalUsed,
totalBudget,
result.TotalUsed,
),
),
schema.UserMessage(fmt.Sprintf(
"当前处理周次W%d\n以下是当前周混合日程JSON\n%s\n\n用户约束%s\n\n注意本 worker 仅允许优化 W%d 内的任务。",
week,
string(hybridJSON),
constraintsText,
week,
)),
}
for result.TotalUsed < totalBudget && result.EffectiveUsed < effectiveBudget {
remainingTotal := totalBudget - result.TotalUsed
remainingEffective := effectiveBudget - result.EffectiveUsed
emitStage(
"schedule_plan.weekly_refine.round",
fmt.Sprintf(
"W%d 新一轮决策:总预算剩余=%d/%d有效预算剩余=%d/%d。",
week,
remainingTotal,
totalBudget,
remainingEffective,
effectiveBudget,
),
)
// 1. 每轮更新系统提示中的预算占位符。
messages[0] = schema.SystemMessage(
renderWeeklyPromptWithBudget(
remainingEffective,
effectiveBudget,
result.EffectiveUsed,
remainingTotal,
totalBudget,
result.TotalUsed,
),
)
roundCtx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctx, weeklyReactRoundTimeout)
content, genErr := generateWeeklyRefineRound(roundCtx, chatModel, messages)
cancel()
if genErr != nil {
result.Summary = fmt.Sprintf("W%d 模型调用失败,已保留当前结果。", week)
return result, fmt.Errorf("周级 worker 调用失败 week=%d: %w", week, genErr)
}
parsed, parseErr := parseReactLLMOutput(content)
if parseErr != nil {
result.Summary = fmt.Sprintf("W%d 输出格式异常,已保留当前结果。", week)
return result, fmt.Errorf("周级 worker 解析失败 week=%d: %w", week, parseErr)
}
// 2. done=true 直接正常结束,不再消耗预算。
if parsed.Done {
summary := strings.TrimSpace(parsed.Summary)
if summary == "" {
summary = fmt.Sprintf(
"W%d 优化结束(总动作已用 %d/%d有效动作已用 %d/%d。",
week,
result.TotalUsed, totalBudget,
result.EffectiveUsed, effectiveBudget,
)
}
result.Summary = summary
break
}
// 3. 只取一个工具调用,强制单步。
call, warn := pickSingleToolCall(parsed.ToolCalls)
if call == nil {
result.Summary = fmt.Sprintf(
"W%d 无可执行动作,提前结束(总动作已用 %d/%d有效动作已用 %d/%d。",
week,
result.TotalUsed, totalBudget,
result.EffectiveUsed, effectiveBudget,
)
break
}
if warn != "" {
result.ActionLogs = append(result.ActionLogs, fmt.Sprintf("W%d 警告:%s", week, warn))
}
// 4. 执行工具:总预算总是扣减;有效预算仅成功时扣减。
result.TotalUsed++
nextEntries, toolResult := dispatchWeeklySingleActionTool(result.Entries, *call, week, window)
if toolResult.Success {
result.EffectiveUsed++
result.Entries = nextEntries
}
logLine := fmt.Sprintf(
"W%d 动作[%s] 结果=%t总预算=%d/%d有效预算=%d/%d详情=%s",
week,
toolResult.Tool,
toolResult.Success,
result.TotalUsed,
totalBudget,
result.EffectiveUsed,
effectiveBudget,
toolResult.Result,
)
result.ActionLogs = append(result.ActionLogs, logLine)
statusMark := "FAIL"
if toolResult.Success {
statusMark = "OK"
}
emitStage("schedule_plan.weekly_refine.tool_call", fmt.Sprintf("[%s] %s", statusMark, logLine))
// 5. 把“本轮输出 + 工具结果”拼回下一轮上下文,驱动增量推理。
messages = append(messages, schema.AssistantMessage(content, nil))
toolResultJSON, _ := json.Marshal([]reactToolResult{toolResult})
messages = append(messages, schema.UserMessage(
fmt.Sprintf(
"上一轮工具结果:%s\n当前预算总剩余=%d有效剩余=%d\n请继续按“单步动作”规则决策仅一个工具调用或 done。",
string(toolResultJSON),
totalBudget-result.TotalUsed,
effectiveBudget-result.EffectiveUsed,
),
))
}
if strings.TrimSpace(result.Summary) == "" {
result.Summary = fmt.Sprintf(
"W%d 预算耗尽停止(总动作已用 %d/%d有效动作已用 %d/%d。",
week,
result.TotalUsed, totalBudget,
result.EffectiveUsed, effectiveBudget,
)
}
return result, nil
}
// generateWeeklyRefineRound 调用模型生成“单周单步”决策输出。
//
// 说明:
// 1. 周级仍保留 thinking提高复杂排程准确率
// 2. 但不把 reasoning 实时透传给前端,避免刷屏;
// 3. 仅返回最终 content交给 JSON 解析器处理。
func generateWeeklyRefineRound(
ctx context.Context,
chatModel *ark.ChatModel,
messages []*schema.Message,
) (string, error) {
resp, err := chatModel.Generate(
ctx,
messages,
ark.WithThinking(&arkModel.Thinking{Type: arkModel.ThinkingTypeEnabled}),
einoModel.WithTemperature(0.2),
)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
if resp == nil {
return "", fmt.Errorf("周级单步调用返回为空")
}
content := strings.TrimSpace(resp.Content)
if content == "" {
return "", fmt.Errorf("周级单步调用返回内容为空")
}
return content, nil
}
// renderWeeklyPromptWithBudget 渲染周级单步优化的预算占位符。
//
// 1. 保留旧占位符 {{budget*}} 兼容历史模板;
// 2. 新增 action_total/action_effective 占位符表达双预算语义;
// 3. 所有负值都会在这里兜底归零,避免传给模型异常预算。
func renderWeeklyPromptWithBudget(
remainingEffective int,
effectiveBudget int,
usedEffective int,
remainingTotal int,
totalBudget int,
usedTotal int,
) string {
if effectiveBudget <= 0 {
effectiveBudget = schedulePlanDefaultWeeklyAdjustBudget
}
if totalBudget <= 0 {
totalBudget = schedulePlanDefaultWeeklyTotalBudget
}
if remainingEffective < 0 {
remainingEffective = 0
}
if remainingTotal < 0 {
remainingTotal = 0
}
if usedEffective < 0 {
usedEffective = 0
}
if usedTotal < 0 {
usedTotal = 0
}
if usedEffective > effectiveBudget {
usedEffective = effectiveBudget
}
if usedTotal > totalBudget {
usedTotal = totalBudget
}
prompt := SchedulePlanWeeklyReactPrompt
prompt = strings.ReplaceAll(prompt, "{{action_total_remaining}}", fmt.Sprintf("%d", remainingTotal))
prompt = strings.ReplaceAll(prompt, "{{action_total_budget}}", fmt.Sprintf("%d", totalBudget))
prompt = strings.ReplaceAll(prompt, "{{action_total_used}}", fmt.Sprintf("%d", usedTotal))
prompt = strings.ReplaceAll(prompt, "{{action_effective_remaining}}", fmt.Sprintf("%d", remainingEffective))
prompt = strings.ReplaceAll(prompt, "{{action_effective_budget}}", fmt.Sprintf("%d", effectiveBudget))
prompt = strings.ReplaceAll(prompt, "{{action_effective_used}}", fmt.Sprintf("%d", usedEffective))
// 兼容旧模板占位符,避免历史 prompt 残留时出现未替换文本。
prompt = strings.ReplaceAll(prompt, "{{budget_remaining}}", fmt.Sprintf("%d", remainingEffective))
prompt = strings.ReplaceAll(prompt, "{{budget_total}}", fmt.Sprintf("%d", effectiveBudget))
prompt = strings.ReplaceAll(prompt, "{{budget_used}}", fmt.Sprintf("%d", usedEffective))
prompt = strings.ReplaceAll(prompt, "{{budget}}", fmt.Sprintf("%d总额度 %d已用 %d", remainingEffective, effectiveBudget, usedEffective))
return prompt
}
// pickSingleToolCall 在“单步动作模式”下选择一个工具调用。
//
// 返回语义:
// 1. call=nil没有可执行工具
// 2. warn 非空:模型返回了多个工具,本轮仅执行第一个。
func pickSingleToolCall(toolCalls []reactToolCall) (*reactToolCall, string) {
if len(toolCalls) == 0 {
return nil, ""
}
call := toolCalls[0]
if len(toolCalls) == 1 {
return &call, ""
}
return &call, fmt.Sprintf("模型返回了 %d 个工具调用,单步模式仅执行第一个:%s", len(toolCalls), call.Tool)
}
// splitHybridEntriesByWeek 按 week 对混合条目分组并返回稳定周序。
func splitHybridEntriesByWeek(entries []model.HybridScheduleEntry) ([]int, map[int][]model.HybridScheduleEntry) {
byWeek := make(map[int][]model.HybridScheduleEntry)
for _, entry := range entries {
byWeek[entry.Week] = append(byWeek[entry.Week], entry)
}
weeks := make([]int, 0, len(byWeek))
for week := range byWeek {
weeks = append(weeks, week)
}
sort.Ints(weeks)
return weeks, byWeek
}
type weightedBudgetRemainder struct {
Index int
Remainder int
Load int
}
// splitWeeklyBudgetsByLoad 根据“有效周保底 + 周负载加权”拆分预算。
//
// 职责边界:
// 1. 负责:返回与 activeWeeks 同索引对齐的总预算/有效预算;
// 2. 负责:在预算不足时按负载优先覆盖高负载周;
// 3. 不负责:执行周级动作与状态落盘(由 runSingleWeekRefineWorker / runWeeklyRefineNode 负责)。
//
// 输入输出语义:
// 1. coveredWeeks 表示“同时拿到 >=1 总预算和 >=1 有效预算”的周数;
// 2. 当任一全局预算 <=0 时,返回全 0上游将据此跳过对应周优化
// 3. 返回的 weeklyLoads 仅用于可观测性,不参与后续状态持久化。
func splitWeeklyBudgetsByLoad(
activeWeeks []int,
weekEntries map[int][]model.HybridScheduleEntry,
totalBudget int,
effectiveBudget int,
) (totalByWeek []int, effectiveByWeek []int, weeklyLoads []int, coveredWeeks int) {
weekCount := len(activeWeeks)
if weekCount == 0 {
return nil, nil, nil, 0
}
if totalBudget < 0 {
totalBudget = 0
}
if effectiveBudget < 0 {
effectiveBudget = 0
}
weeklyLoads = buildWeeklyLoadScores(activeWeeks, weekEntries)
totalByWeek = make([]int, weekCount)
effectiveByWeek = make([]int, weekCount)
if totalBudget == 0 || effectiveBudget == 0 {
return totalByWeek, effectiveByWeek, weeklyLoads, 0
}
// 1. 先计算“可保底覆盖周数”。
// 1.1 目标是每个有效周至少 1 个总预算 + 1 个有效预算;
// 1.2 失败场景:当预算小于有效周数量时,不可能全覆盖;
// 1.3 兜底策略:只覆盖高负载周,避免把预算分散到无法执行的周。
coveredWeeks = weekCount
if totalBudget < coveredWeeks {
coveredWeeks = totalBudget
}
if effectiveBudget < coveredWeeks {
coveredWeeks = effectiveBudget
}
if coveredWeeks <= 0 {
return totalByWeek, effectiveByWeek, weeklyLoads, 0
}
coveredIndexes := pickTopLoadWeekIndexes(weeklyLoads, coveredWeeks)
for _, idx := range coveredIndexes {
totalByWeek[idx]++
effectiveByWeek[idx]++
}
// 2. 再把剩余预算按周负载加权分配。
// 2.1 判断依据:负载越高,给到的额外预算越多,优先解决高密度周;
// 2.2 失败场景:负载异常(<=0会导致权重失真
// 2.3 兜底策略:权重最小按 1 处理,保证分配可持续、不会 panic。
addWeightedBudget(totalByWeek, weeklyLoads, coveredIndexes, totalBudget-coveredWeeks)
addWeightedBudget(effectiveByWeek, weeklyLoads, coveredIndexes, effectiveBudget-coveredWeeks)
return totalByWeek, effectiveByWeek, weeklyLoads, coveredWeeks
}
// buildWeeklyLoadScores 计算每个有效周的负载评分。
//
// 职责边界:
// 1. 负责:以 suggested 任务的节次跨度作为周负载;
// 2. 不负责:预算分配策略与排序决策(由 splitWeeklyBudgetsByLoad/pickTopLoadWeekIndexes 负责)。
func buildWeeklyLoadScores(
activeWeeks []int,
weekEntries map[int][]model.HybridScheduleEntry,
) []int {
loads := make([]int, len(activeWeeks))
for idx, week := range activeWeeks {
load := 0
for _, entry := range weekEntries[week] {
if entry.Status != "suggested" {
continue
}
span := entry.SectionTo - entry.SectionFrom + 1
if span <= 0 {
span = 1
}
load += span
}
if load <= 0 {
// 兜底:脏数据或异常节次下仍给该周最小权重,避免被完全饿死。
load = 1
}
loads[idx] = load
}
return loads
}
// pickTopLoadWeekIndexes 选择负载最高的 topN 个周索引。
func pickTopLoadWeekIndexes(loads []int, topN int) []int {
if topN <= 0 || len(loads) == 0 {
return nil
}
indexes := make([]int, len(loads))
for i := range loads {
indexes[i] = i
}
sort.SliceStable(indexes, func(i, j int) bool {
left := loads[indexes[i]]
right := loads[indexes[j]]
if left != right {
return left > right
}
return indexes[i] < indexes[j]
})
if topN > len(indexes) {
topN = len(indexes)
}
selected := append([]int(nil), indexes[:topN]...)
sort.Ints(selected)
return selected
}
// addWeightedBudget 把剩余预算按权重分配到目标周。
//
// 说明:
// 1. 先按整数份额分配;
// 2. 再按“最大余数法”分发尾差,保证总和严格守恒;
// 3. 余数相同时优先高负载周,再按索引稳定排序,避免结果抖动。
func addWeightedBudget(
budgets []int,
loads []int,
targetIndexes []int,
remainingBudget int,
) {
if remainingBudget <= 0 || len(targetIndexes) == 0 {
return
}
totalLoad := 0
normalizedLoadByIndex := make(map[int]int, len(targetIndexes))
for _, idx := range targetIndexes {
load := 1
if idx >= 0 && idx < len(loads) && loads[idx] > 0 {
load = loads[idx]
}
normalizedLoadByIndex[idx] = load
totalLoad += load
}
if totalLoad <= 0 {
// 理论上不会出现;兜底均匀轮询分配,保证不会丢预算。
for i := 0; i < remainingBudget; i++ {
budgets[targetIndexes[i%len(targetIndexes)]]++
}
return
}
allocated := 0
remainders := make([]weightedBudgetRemainder, 0, len(targetIndexes))
for _, idx := range targetIndexes {
load := normalizedLoadByIndex[idx]
shareProduct := remainingBudget * load
share := shareProduct / totalLoad
budgets[idx] += share
allocated += share
remainders = append(remainders, weightedBudgetRemainder{
Index: idx,
Remainder: shareProduct % totalLoad,
Load: load,
})
}
left := remainingBudget - allocated
if left <= 0 {
return
}
sort.SliceStable(remainders, func(i, j int) bool {
if remainders[i].Remainder != remainders[j].Remainder {
return remainders[i].Remainder > remainders[j].Remainder
}
if remainders[i].Load != remainders[j].Load {
return remainders[i].Load > remainders[j].Load
}
return remainders[i].Index < remainders[j].Index
})
for i := 0; i < left; i++ {
budgets[remainders[i%len(remainders)].Index]++
}
}
// sortHybridEntries 对条目做稳定排序,确保后续预览输出稳定。
func sortHybridEntries(entries []model.HybridScheduleEntry) {
sort.SliceStable(entries, func(i, j int) bool {
left := entries[i]
right := entries[j]
if left.Week != right.Week {
return left.Week < right.Week
}
if left.DayOfWeek != right.DayOfWeek {
return left.DayOfWeek < right.DayOfWeek
}
if left.SectionFrom != right.SectionFrom {
return left.SectionFrom < right.SectionFrom
}
if left.SectionTo != right.SectionTo {
return left.SectionTo < right.SectionTo
}
if left.Status != right.Status {
// existing 放前suggested 放后,便于观察课表底板与建议层。
return left.Status < right.Status
}
return left.Name < right.Name
})
}