后端: 1. taskclass 执行闭环继续收紧——Plan / Execute 全面切到“最小工具闭环”视角,明确学习目标/总节数/禁排时段/排除星期默认停留 taskclass 域;未给日期范围时禁止擅自补 start_date/end_date,upsert_task_class 重试前先做写前检查并区分“内部表示修正”与“必须追问用户”的关键时间事实 2. QuickTask / TaskQuery 轻量链路继续收敛——新增 model/taskquery_contract.go 统一查询协议,QuickTaskDeps / start.go 改用 model 层参数;删除 query_tasks / quick_note_create 旧工具实现,避免任务查询与随口记再回流 execute 工具链 3. schedule 微调工具继续瘦身——下线 spread_even / min_context_switch 及其复合规划逻辑,清理 analyze_load / analyze_subjects / analyze_context / analyze_tolerance 等历史能力;execute 顺序策略收敛为局部 move / swap,提示词与工具目录仅暴露当前真实可用工具 4. 执行与时间线体验补齐——execute 为流式 speak 补发归一化尾部,避免 deliver 文案黏连;前端时间线新增 interrupt / status 协议识别、工具事件归并与状态过滤,减少 ToolTrace 重复和会话重建误判 前端: 5. AssistantPanel 适配新版 timeline extra 事件——schedule_agent.ts 补齐 interrupt / status kind,工具调用与结果按摘要/参数/工具名合并,恢复历史时不再把协议事件误判成用户消息
105 lines
5.0 KiB
Go
105 lines
5.0 KiB
Go
package newagentprompt
|
||
|
||
import (
|
||
"fmt"
|
||
"strings"
|
||
|
||
newagentmodel "github.com/LoveLosita/smartflow/backend/newAgent/model"
|
||
newagenttools "github.com/LoveLosita/smartflow/backend/newAgent/tools"
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
// renderExecuteNextStepHintV2 生成 execute.msg3 的轻量方向提示。
|
||
//
|
||
// 设计目标:
|
||
// 1. 主动优化模式下,只强调“先 analyze_health,再从 candidates 里选”,不再散发额外搜索暗示。
|
||
// 2. 普通链路仍保留必要的业务引导,避免误伤用户明确提出的普通调整请求。
|
||
// 3. 提示只给方向,不替模型代填最终写参数。
|
||
func renderExecuteNextStepHintV2(
|
||
state *newagentmodel.CommonState,
|
||
latestAnalyze string,
|
||
latestMutation string,
|
||
roughBuildDone bool,
|
||
) string {
|
||
if state == nil {
|
||
return ""
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
activeDomain := strings.TrimSpace(state.ActiveToolDomain)
|
||
activePacks := newagenttools.ResolveEffectiveToolPacks(state.ActiveToolDomain, state.ActiveToolPacks)
|
||
|
||
if state.ActiveOptimizeOnly {
|
||
switch {
|
||
case activeDomain == "" && roughBuildDone:
|
||
return "当前是粗排后主动优化专用模式;先激活 schedule,并只围绕 analyze_health -> move/swap 候选闭环推进。"
|
||
case !state.HealthCheckDone:
|
||
return "当前是粗排后主动优化专用模式;先调 analyze_health,等待后端给出 candidates,再做选择。"
|
||
case !state.HealthIsFeasible || strings.EqualFold(strings.TrimSpace(state.HealthRecommendedOperation), "ask_user"):
|
||
return "analyze_health 已判定当前更像时间窗或信息约束问题;不要继续挪动,先把冲突或缺失点明确告诉用户。"
|
||
case !state.HealthShouldContinueOptimize:
|
||
return "analyze_health 已判定当前无需继续主动优化;若用户没有新增要求,直接收口。"
|
||
default:
|
||
return "当前是粗排后主动优化专用模式;直接从 analyze_health 的 decision.candidates 里选一个合法 move/swap 执行,不要再自己搜索读工具。"
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if activeDomain == "schedule" && state.HealthCheckDone {
|
||
switch {
|
||
case !state.HealthShouldContinueOptimize && state.HealthIsForcedImperfection:
|
||
return fmt.Sprintf(
|
||
"analyze_health 已判定当前更像约束代价:tightness=%s,主问题=%s。优先考虑收口。",
|
||
fallbackExecuteText(state.HealthTightnessLevel, "unknown"),
|
||
fallbackExecuteText(state.HealthPrimaryProblem, "无"),
|
||
)
|
||
case !state.HealthShouldContinueOptimize:
|
||
return fmt.Sprintf(
|
||
"analyze_health 已判定当前没有更值得继续处理的局部问题:%s。若用户未追加新要求,优先收口。",
|
||
fallbackExecuteText(state.HealthPrimaryProblem, "当前可直接收口"),
|
||
)
|
||
case state.HealthStagnationCount > 0:
|
||
return fmt.Sprintf(
|
||
"最近诊断已连续 %d 次无明显改善;若本轮仍不能让主问题变轻,优先收口。当前主问题:%s。",
|
||
state.HealthStagnationCount,
|
||
fallbackExecuteText(state.HealthPrimaryProblem, "无"),
|
||
)
|
||
case strings.EqualFold(strings.TrimSpace(state.HealthRecommendedOperation), "swap"):
|
||
return fmt.Sprintf(
|
||
"当前主问题:%s。优先在已有落位之间做局部 swap,别把问题扩散到更远的天数。",
|
||
fallbackExecuteText(state.HealthPrimaryProblem, "无"),
|
||
)
|
||
case strings.EqualFold(strings.TrimSpace(state.HealthRecommendedOperation), "move"):
|
||
return fmt.Sprintf(
|
||
"当前主问题:%s。若要 move,只在近范围合法落点里小修,不要做全窗口搜索。",
|
||
fallbackExecuteText(state.HealthPrimaryProblem, "无"),
|
||
)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if activeDomain == "" {
|
||
if roughBuildDone {
|
||
return `先激活 schedule 业务域;当前是粗排后的微调场景,通常至少需要 mutation+analyze。若要按统一条件逐个处理一批任务,再加 packs=["queue"]。`
|
||
}
|
||
return `先判断当前任务属于哪个业务域,再用 context_tools_add 激活对应工具。若用户只是在描述学习目标、总节数、难度、节次偏好、禁排时段、排除星期、内容拆分授权,默认先走 taskclass;只有用户明确要求“排进日程 / 给出具体时间安排 / 现在就排一版”时,才切 schedule。`
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if activeDomain == "schedule" &&
|
||
strings.Contains(latestMutation, "batch_move") &&
|
||
(strings.Contains(latestMutation, "缺少") || strings.Contains(latestMutation, "无效")) {
|
||
return `当前 batch_move 路径受参数约束;若要处理一批符合同一条件的任务,优先加 packs=["queue"] 逐个处理。`
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if activeDomain == "schedule" &&
|
||
latestAnalyze != "" &&
|
||
strings.Contains(latestAnalyze, "metrics") &&
|
||
!containsExecutePack(activePacks, newagenttools.ToolPackQueue) {
|
||
return `若诊断已经完成,下一步应转入读事实或写操作,不要重复 analyze_health;涉及同类批量任务时优先考虑 packs=["queue"]。`
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if activeDomain == "taskclass" &&
|
||
state.TaskClassUpsertLastTried &&
|
||
!state.TaskClassUpsertLastSuccess {
|
||
return `先判断 validation.issues 是“用户缺信息”还是“内部表示修正”;能从上下文补的先静默补齐,再用 confirm 重试 upsert_task_class,不要继续解释底层约束,更不要直接收口。`
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
return ""
|
||
}
|