c689af56c8
✨ feat(agent): 重构 Agent 分层并修复普通聊天助手消息未写入 Redis 的问题 🔧 按职责重构 backend/agent 目录为 route/chat/quicknote 三层结构 🔄 将随口记链路拆分为 graph/nodes/tool/state/prompt，其中 graph 仅负责连线 🏃 新增 quicknote runner（方法引用）来收口节点依赖，提升代码可读性 🔀 将控制码分流逻辑抽离到 agent/route，服务层改为薄封装调用 📚 更新相关 README 与测试引用路径，保持原业务逻辑不变 🐛 修复普通聊天链路遗漏 assistant 写入 Redis 的问题（确保 MySQL 和 Redis 的口径一致）
74 lines
2.8 KiB
Go
74 lines
2.8 KiB
Go
package service
|
||
|
||
import (
|
||
"strings"
|
||
"testing"
|
||
|
||
"github.com/LoveLosita/smartflow/backend/agent/quicknote"
|
||
"github.com/LoveLosita/smartflow/backend/agent/route"
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
// TestParseQuickNoteRouteControlTag_QuickNote
|
||
// 目的：验证模型控制码在 action=quick_note 时可被稳定解析，
|
||
// 并且会校验 nonce，避免历史脏内容或伪造片段误命中。
|
||
func TestParseQuickNoteRouteControlTag_QuickNote(t *testing.T) {
|
||
nonce := "abc123nonce"
|
||
raw := `<SMARTFLOW_ROUTE nonce="abc123nonce" action="quick_note"></SMARTFLOW_ROUTE>
|
||
<SMARTFLOW_REASON>用户明确在请求未来提醒</SMARTFLOW_REASON>`
|
||
|
||
decision, err := route.ParseQuickNoteRouteControlTag(raw, nonce)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("解析失败: %v", err)
|
||
}
|
||
if decision == nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("decision 不应为空")
|
||
}
|
||
if decision.Action != route.ActionQuickNote {
|
||
t.Fatalf("action 解析错误，期望=%s 实际=%s", route.ActionQuickNote, decision.Action)
|
||
}
|
||
if strings.TrimSpace(decision.Reason) == "" {
|
||
t.Fatalf("reason 不应为空")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestParseQuickNoteRouteControlTag_NonceMismatch
|
||
// 目的：确保 nonce 不匹配时直接报错，避免把非本次请求的控制码当作有效路由。
|
||
func TestParseQuickNoteRouteControlTag_NonceMismatch(t *testing.T) {
|
||
raw := `<SMARTFLOW_ROUTE nonce="wrongnonce" action="chat"></SMARTFLOW_ROUTE>`
|
||
if _, err := route.ParseQuickNoteRouteControlTag(raw, "expectednonce"); err == nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("期望 nonce 不匹配时报错，但未报错")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestBuildQuickNoteFinalReply_NoFalseSuccessWithoutTaskID
|
||
// 目的：即使 state.Persisted 被错误置为 true，只要 task_id 无效，也不能返回“安排成功”文案。
|
||
func TestBuildQuickNoteFinalReply_NoFalseSuccessWithoutTaskID(t *testing.T) {
|
||
state := &quicknote.QuickNoteState{
|
||
Persisted: true,
|
||
PersistedTaskID: 0,
|
||
ExtractedTitle: "去下馆子",
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
reply := buildQuickNoteFinalReply(nil, nil, "我今天晚上6点要去下馆子，记得喊我", state)
|
||
if strings.Contains(reply, "给你安排上了") || strings.Contains(reply, "已安排") {
|
||
t.Fatalf("不应返回成功文案，实际回复=%s", reply)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestBuildQuickNoteFinalReply_UseExtractedBanter
|
||
// 目的：当聚合规划阶段已经产出 banter 时，最终回复应直接复用，避免再次调用润色模型。
|
||
func TestBuildQuickNoteFinalReply_UseExtractedBanter(t *testing.T) {
|
||
state := &quicknote.QuickNoteState{
|
||
Persisted: true,
|
||
PersistedTaskID: 12,
|
||
ExtractedTitle: "明天去取快递",
|
||
ExtractedPriority: 2,
|
||
ExtractedBanter: "取件路上注意保暖，别被风吹懵了。",
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
reply := buildQuickNoteFinalReply(nil, nil, "明天上午12点我要去取快递，到时候记得q我", state)
|
||
if !strings.Contains(reply, "取件路上注意保暖") {
|
||
t.Fatalf("期望复用 ExtractedBanter，实际回复=%s", reply)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|