Files
smartmate/backend/newAgent/node/rough_build.go
Losita cdedd3c968 Version: 0.9.5.dev.260407
后端:
1.粗排链路收口(按 task_class_ids 精确加载 ScheduleState + 规划窗口抗脏数据)
  - 更新conv/schedule_provider.go:新增 LoadScheduleStateForTaskClasses;优先按本轮任务类加载窗口;buildWindowFromTaskClasses 改为逐条过滤坏日期,避免 DayMapping 被全量任务类污染
  - 更新model/state_store.go:新增 ScopedScheduleStateProvider 可选接口
  - 更新model/graph_run_state.go:EnsureScheduleState 首次加载时优先走 scoped provider,再做 scope 裁剪
2.粗排建议态语义统一(pending/existing → pending/suggested/existing)
  - 新建tools/status.go:统一 IsPendingTask / IsSuggestedTask / IsExistingTask / scope 过滤逻辑
  - 更新node/rough_build.go:粗排回写后任务显式转 suggested;pending 统计仅看“真实 pending”
  - 更新tools/state.go:ScheduleTask.Status/Slots/Duration 注释补齐 suggested 语义
  - 更新tools/read_helpers.go + read_tools.go:overview/list_tasks/task_info 支持 suggested 展示;占用计算按“已落位任务”统一处理
  - 更新tools/write_helpers.go + write_tools.go:place/move/swap/unplace 全量切到 suggested/existing/pending 新语义
  - 更新tools/registry.go + SCHEDULE_TOOLS.md:工具描述、参数枚举、文档口径同步到 suggested 语义
  - 更新conv/schedule_preview.go:预览层统一通过 IsSuggestedTask 输出 suggested,兼容旧快照
  - 更新service/agentsvc/agent_newagent.go:预览 debug 摘要改为 pending/suggested/existing 三态统计
3.粗排调试增强
  - 更新node/rough_build.go:新增 applied/day_mapping_miss/task_item_match_miss 统计及样本日志,便于排查 placement 未落回 state 的根因
前端:无 仓库:无
2026-04-07 23:58:00 +08:00

311 lines
9.7 KiB
Go
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
package newagentnode
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"log"
"strconv"
"strings"
newagentmodel "github.com/LoveLosita/smartflow/backend/newAgent/model"
newagenttools "github.com/LoveLosita/smartflow/backend/newAgent/tools"
)
const (
roughBuildStageName = "rough_build"
roughBuildStatusBlock = "rough_build.status"
roughBuildSampleLimit = 3
)
type roughBuildApplyStats struct {
AppliedCount int
DayMappingMissCount int
TaskItemMatchMissCount int
DayMappingMissSamples []string
TaskItemMatchMissSamples []string
}
// RunRoughBuildNode 执行粗排节点逻辑。
//
// 步骤说明:
// 1. 推送"正在粗排"状态给前端;
// 2. 从 CommonState 读取 TaskClassIDs确认有需要排课的任务类
// 3. 加载 ScheduleState含 DayMapping
// 4. 调用 RoughBuildFunc 拿到粗排结果([]RoughBuildPlacement
// 5. 把粗排结果写入 ScheduleState把已落位任务标记为 suggested
// 6. 若粗排后仍存在真实 pending则写入正式 abort 结果并结束本轮;
// 7. 否则推送"粗排完成"状态,清除 NeedsRoughBuild 标记,进入执行阶段。
func RunRoughBuildNode(ctx context.Context, st *newagentmodel.AgentGraphState) error {
if st == nil {
return fmt.Errorf("rough build node: state is nil")
}
flowState := st.EnsureFlowState()
emitter := st.EnsureChunkEmitter()
// 1. 推送状态:告知前端进入粗排环节。
_ = emitter.EmitStatus(
roughBuildStatusBlock,
roughBuildStageName,
"rough_building",
"正在为你生成初始排课方案,请稍候。",
true,
)
// 2. 校验依赖。
if st.Deps.RoughBuildFunc == nil {
return fmt.Errorf("rough build node: RoughBuildFunc 未注入")
}
// 3. 读取任务类 IDs。
taskClassIDs := flowState.TaskClassIDs
if len(taskClassIDs) == 0 {
// 没有任务类 ID 时静默跳过粗排,直接进入执行阶段。
flowState.Phase = newagentmodel.PhaseExecuting
flowState.NeedsRoughBuild = false
return nil
}
// 4. 加载 ScheduleState含 DayMapping用于坐标转换
scheduleState, err := st.EnsureScheduleState(ctx)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("rough build node: 加载日程状态失败: %w", err)
}
if scheduleState == nil {
return fmt.Errorf("rough build node: ScheduleState 为空,无法执行粗排")
}
// 5. 调用粗排算法。
placements, err := st.Deps.RoughBuildFunc(ctx, flowState.UserID, taskClassIDs)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("rough build node: 粗排算法失败: %w", err)
}
// 6. 把粗排结果写入 ScheduleState。
applyStats := applyRoughBuildPlacements(scheduleState, placements)
// 7. 先校验粗排后是否仍有真实 pending。
stillPending := countPendingTasks(scheduleState, taskClassIDs)
log.Printf(
"[DEBUG] rough_build scope_task_classes=%v placements=%d applied=%d day_mapping_miss=%d task_item_match_miss=%d pending_in_scope=%d total_tasks=%d window_days=%d",
taskClassIDs,
len(placements),
applyStats.AppliedCount,
applyStats.DayMappingMissCount,
applyStats.TaskItemMatchMissCount,
stillPending,
len(scheduleState.Tasks),
len(scheduleState.Window.DayMapping),
)
if applyStats.DayMappingMissCount > 0 {
log.Printf(
"[DEBUG] rough_build day_mapping_miss_samples=%v window=%s",
applyStats.DayMappingMissSamples,
summarizeRoughBuildWindow(scheduleState),
)
}
if applyStats.TaskItemMatchMissCount > 0 {
log.Printf(
"[DEBUG] rough_build task_item_match_miss_samples=%v scoped_task_samples=%v",
applyStats.TaskItemMatchMissSamples,
collectScopedTaskSamples(scheduleState, taskClassIDs),
)
}
if stillPending > 0 {
failureMessage := fmt.Sprintf(
"初始排课方案构建异常:粗排后仍有 %d 个任务未获得初始落位。按当前规则,本轮不进入微调,请检查粗排算法或任务数据。",
stillPending,
)
_ = emitter.EmitStatus(
roughBuildStatusBlock,
roughBuildStageName,
"rough_build_failed",
failureMessage,
true,
)
flowState.NeedsRoughBuild = false
flowState.Abort(
roughBuildStageName,
"rough_build_pending_remaining",
failureMessage,
fmt.Sprintf("rough build finished with %d real pending tasks remaining", stillPending),
)
return nil
}
// 8. 推送完成状态。
_ = emitter.EmitStatus(
roughBuildStatusBlock,
roughBuildStageName,
"rough_build_done",
fmt.Sprintf("初始排课方案已生成,共 %d 个任务已预排,进入微调阶段。", len(placements)),
false,
)
// 9. 把粗排完成信息写入 pinned context让 Execute 阶段的 LLM 直接进入查看和微调。
// 构造任务类 ID 字符串,供 pinned block 明确标注,避免 Execute LLM 因找不到 task_class_id 来源而 ask_user。
idParts := make([]string, len(taskClassIDs))
for i, id := range taskClassIDs {
idParts[i] = strconv.Itoa(id)
}
idStr := strings.Join(idParts, ", ")
pinnedContent := fmt.Sprintf(
"后端已自动运行粗排算法(任务类 ID[%s]),初始排课方案已写入日程状态(共 %d 个任务已预排)。\n"+
"这些预排任务已标记为 suggested表示“可继续优化的建议落位”不是待补排任务。\n"+
"请先调用 get_overview 查看整体分布,再使用 move / swap / unplace 微调不合理的位置。\n"+
"本轮不需要再调用 place也无需再次触发粗排。",
idStr, len(placements),
)
st.EnsureConversationContext().UpsertPinnedBlock(newagentmodel.ContextBlock{
Key: "rough_build_done",
Title: "粗排已完成",
Content: pinnedContent,
})
// 10. 清除标记,进入执行阶段。
flowState.NeedsRoughBuild = false
flowState.Phase = newagentmodel.PhaseExecuting
return nil
}
// countPendingTasks 统计粗排后仍无位置的待安排任务数。
//
// 说明:
// 1. 第一轮修复后,粗排成功会把任务直接标记为 suggested
// 2. 为兼容旧快照仍按“pending 且 Slots 为空”认定真正未覆盖;
// 3. 只要这里仍大于 0就应视为粗排异常而不是交给 LLM 补排。
func countPendingTasks(state *newagenttools.ScheduleState, taskClassIDs []int) int {
if state == nil {
return 0
}
count := 0
for i := range state.Tasks {
task := state.Tasks[i]
if !newagenttools.IsPendingTask(task) {
continue
}
if len(taskClassIDs) > 0 && !newagenttools.IsTaskInRequestedClassScope(task, taskClassIDs) {
continue
}
if newagenttools.IsPendingTask(task) {
count++
}
}
return count
}
// applyRoughBuildPlacements 把粗排结果写入 ScheduleState 对应任务的 Slots。
//
// 设计说明:
// 1. 通过 task_item_idSourceID定位任务
// 2. 用 DayMapping 把 (week, dayOfWeek) 转为 day_index
// 3. 对成功落位的任务写入 Slots并显式标记为 suggested
// 4. suggested 表示“粗排建议位”,后续可用 move/swap/unplace 微调;
// 5. 转换失败的条目静默跳过,不中断整体流程。
func applyRoughBuildPlacements(
state *newagenttools.ScheduleState,
placements []newagentmodel.RoughBuildPlacement,
) roughBuildApplyStats {
stats := roughBuildApplyStats{}
if state == nil {
return stats
}
taskIndexByItemID := make(map[int][]int)
for i := range state.Tasks {
task := state.Tasks[i]
if task.Source != "task_item" {
continue
}
taskIndexByItemID[task.SourceID] = append(taskIndexByItemID[task.SourceID], i)
}
for _, p := range placements {
day, ok := state.WeekDayToDay(p.Week, p.DayOfWeek)
if !ok {
stats.DayMappingMissCount++
stats.DayMappingMissSamples = appendPlacementSample(stats.DayMappingMissSamples, p)
continue // DayMapping 里没有对应 day跳过
}
matched := false
for _, index := range taskIndexByItemID[p.TaskItemID] {
t := &state.Tasks[index]
t.Slots = []newagenttools.TaskSlot{
{Day: day, SlotStart: p.SectionFrom, SlotEnd: p.SectionTo},
}
t.Status = newagenttools.TaskStatusSuggested
stats.AppliedCount++
matched = true
break
}
if !matched {
stats.TaskItemMatchMissCount++
stats.TaskItemMatchMissSamples = appendPlacementSample(stats.TaskItemMatchMissSamples, p)
}
}
return stats
}
// appendPlacementSample 记录有限数量的 miss 样本,避免 debug 日志爆量。
func appendPlacementSample(samples []string, placement newagentmodel.RoughBuildPlacement) []string {
if len(samples) >= roughBuildSampleLimit {
return samples
}
return append(samples, fmt.Sprintf(
"task_item_id=%d week=%d day=%d sections=%d-%d",
placement.TaskItemID,
placement.Week,
placement.DayOfWeek,
placement.SectionFrom,
placement.SectionTo,
))
}
// summarizeRoughBuildWindow 提供 DayMapping 的紧凑摘要,便于判断窗口是否退化到错误周。
func summarizeRoughBuildWindow(state *newagenttools.ScheduleState) string {
if state == nil || len(state.Window.DayMapping) == 0 {
return "empty"
}
first := state.Window.DayMapping[0]
last := state.Window.DayMapping[len(state.Window.DayMapping)-1]
return fmt.Sprintf(
"days=%d first=W%dD%d last=W%dD%d",
len(state.Window.DayMapping),
first.Week,
first.DayOfWeek,
last.Week,
last.DayOfWeek,
)
}
// collectScopedTaskSamples 提供当前 state 中可用于匹配的 task_item 样本,便于排查 ID 对不上。
func collectScopedTaskSamples(state *newagenttools.ScheduleState, taskClassIDs []int) []string {
if state == nil {
return nil
}
samples := make([]string, 0, roughBuildSampleLimit)
for i := range state.Tasks {
task := state.Tasks[i]
if task.Source != "task_item" {
continue
}
if len(taskClassIDs) > 0 && !newagenttools.IsTaskInRequestedClassScope(task, taskClassIDs) {
continue
}
samples = append(samples, fmt.Sprintf(
"source_id=%d task_class_id=%d status=%s name=%q",
task.SourceID,
task.TaskClassID,
task.Status,
task.Name,
))
if len(samples) >= roughBuildSampleLimit {
break
}
}
return samples
}